Squad (3/5)
It is better than any other African side. Ghana can field a very strong first team, albeit one that is weak in attack but it is susceptible to injury, especially to its midfield powerhouse.
Squad (2.5/5)
Four years ago it would have been three out of five but as AC Milan discovered in the Champions League eventually time takes its toll no matter how great your ability.
Coach (2.5/5)
There are many followers of African football who feel the federation could have done a lot better than someone whose main level of expertise was qualifying minor Serb sides for the Uefa Cup.
Coach (3/5)
Abrasive – when it comes to giving his opinion of how poor football in Australia actually is – and overly cautious, Verbeek is not the inspirational character Hiddink was. He is, however, highly competent.
Attack (2/5)
A lot of Ghana’s play is reliant on breaks from midfield and Matthew Amoah is not quite good enough to shoulder the whole burden alone. The early rounds of the Africa Cup of Nations were not encouraging.
Attack (2/5)
Viduka and Kewell were a formidable combination in Germany but four years on, Viduka is in virtual international retirement and Kewell has a big load on his shoulders.
Defence (3.5/5)
One Rajevac’s real achievements has been to tighten up and toughen up the Ghana back-four and the midfielders who play in front of them. As the Czech Republic and the United States discovered, once Ghana are in front they are hard to peg back.
Defence (3/5)
Australia did not pick up all those clean sheets for nothing. Verbeek has invested plenty of time in a highly-efficient back four which is the main reason why they might fancy their chances against Ghana, who lack a world-class striker.